Search Filters

  • Presentation Format
  • Media Type
  • Diagnosis / Condition
  • Diagnosis Method
  • Patient Populations
  • Treatment / Technique

A High Tibial Slope, Allograft Use, And Poor Patient-Reported Outcome Scores Are Associated With Multiple ACL Graft Failures

A High Tibial Slope, Allograft Use, And Poor Patient-Reported Outcome Scores Are Associated With Multiple ACL Graft Failures

Philipp Wilhelm Winkler, MD, Assoc. Prof., AUSTRIA Ryan Eads, MD, UNITED STATES Nyaluma N. Wagala, MD, UNITED STATES Jonathan D Hughes, MD, PhD, UNITED STATES Bryson P. Lesniak, MD, UNITED STATES Volker Musahl, MD, Prof., UNITED STATES

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania , UNITED STATES


2021 Congress   ePoster Presentation     Not yet rated

 

Anatomic Location

Anatomic Structure

Diagnosis / Condition

Ligaments

ACL

Diagnosis Method

Sports Medicine

This media is available to current ISAKOS Members, Global Link All-Access Subscribers and Webinar/Course Registrants only.

Summary: Repeat ACL graft failures have worse PROs than single graft failures and are associated with a larger posterior tibial slope and higher percentage of allograft use; so, it is recommended to avoid allografts and to consider slope reducing osteotomies at the first ACL revision.


Background

Repeat anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failures are related to worse patient reported outcomes and subsequent graft failures than single graft failures, and often present with concurrent meniscal and cartilage lesions. Despite the body of literature focusing on single ACL graft failures, few studies focus on multiple graft failures. Further investigation into the causes of repeat ACL graft failures is warranted.

Purpose

To compare clinical outcomes, radiographic characteristics, and surgical factors between patients with single and multiple ACL graft failures. It was hypothesized that patients experiencing multiple ACL graft failures exhibit lower patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) and a higher (steeper) posterior tibial slope (PTS) than patients with single ACL graft failure.

Methods

Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included in this retrospective cohort study. Based on the number of ACL graft failures, patients were assigned either to the group “single ACL graft failure “or” multiple ACL graft failures “. The PTS was measured on strict lateral radiographs. Validated PROs including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm Score, Tegner Activity Scale, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury Scale, and Visual Analogue Scale for pain were collected.

Results

Overall, 102 patients were included with 58 patients assigned to the single ACL graft failure group and 44 patients to the multiple ACL graft failures group. Quadriceps tendon autograft was used significantly more often (55% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and allografts were used significantly less often (31% vs. 66%, p < 0.001) as the graft for first revision ACL reconstruction in patients with single versus multiple ACL graft failures. Patients with multiple ACL graft failures were associated with statistically significantly worse PROs (IKDC: 61.7 ± 19.3 vs. 77.4 ± 16.8, p < 0.05; Tegner Activity Scale: 4 (range, 0–7) vs. 6 (range 2–10), p < 0.05), higher PTS (12 ± 3° vs. 9 ± 3°, p < 0.001), and higher rates of subsequent surgery (73% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) and complications (45% vs. 17%, p < 0.05) than patients with single ACL graft failure.

Conclusion

Compared to single ACL graft failure in this study multiple ACL graft failures were associated with worse PROs, higher PTS, and allograft use. During the first revision ACL reconstruction, it is recommended to avoid the use of allografts and to consider slope-reducing osteotomies to avoid multiple ACL graft failures and improve PROs.