Search Filters

  • Presentation Format
  • Media Type
  • Diagnosis / Condition
  • Diagnosis Method
  • Patient Populations
  • Treatment / Technique

Mind the anterior root of the lateral meniscus. A biomechancial perspective.

Mind the anterior root of the lateral meniscus. A biomechancial perspective.

Alejandro Espejo-Reina, MD, MSc, SPAIN María Prado-Novoa, MEng, PhD, SPAIN Ana Pérez-Blanca, PhD, SPAIN Belén Estebánez, MEng, SPAIN Álvaro Raya-Herrero, MEng, SPAIN María Josea Espejo-Reina, MD, SPAIN Alejandro Espejo-Baena, MD, SPAIN

Clínica Espejo, Málaga, Málaga, SPAIN


2021 Congress   ePoster Presentation     rating (1)

 

Anatomic Location

Anatomic Structure

Diagnosis / Condition

Sports Medicine

This media is available to current ISAKOS Members, Global Link All-Access Subscribers and Webinar/Course Registrants only.

Summary: The tear or the anterior root of the lateral meniscus has biomechanics consequences similar to the total meniscectomy, especially in low grades of knee flexion, and its repair restores knee biomechanics


Introduction

Meniscal roots detachment has deleterious consequences for knee biomechanics causing chondral injuries or osteonecrosis. Anterior roots can also produce chondral injuries after anterior root avulsions, probable because of similar biomechanical alterations. Our hypothesis was that the tear of the anterior root of lateral meniscus (ARLM) alters knee biomechanics, increasing the pressure on the cartilage and altering its kinematics; the repair of the tear restores the preinjury levels.
Study Design: Controlled Laboratory Study.

Methods

Nine cadaveric knees underwent 1000N of compression at 0º, 30°, 60° and 90° flexion in 4 lateral meniscus conditions: intact, ARLM tears, in-situ root repair and total meniscectomy. Contact area, mean and peak pressures and position of pressure centers at each articular compartment were determined with the aids pressure sensors at meniscotibial interface.

Results

ARLM avulsions produced contact area decreases in the affected side of 45% at 0º(p=0.012), 40% at 30º(p=0.017), 40% at 60º(p=0.017), 24% at 90º(p=0.025); mean pressure increases of 108% at 0º(p=0.018), 113% at 30º(p=0.012), 85% at 60º(p=0.012), 35% at 90º(p=0.036); and peak pressure increases of 141% at 0º(p=0.012), 153% at 30º(p=0.017), 99% at 60º(p=0.017), all alterations greater at low flexion. Compared to the lesion, in-situ repair partially recovered contact area, increasing a 40% at 0º(p=0.024) and 17% at 60º(p=0.05); mean pressure, decreasing a 51% at 0º(p=0.036), 43% at 30º(p=0.036), 33% at 60º(p=0.036) and peak pressure, decreasing 51% at 0º(p=0.024), 48% at 30º(p=0.034). The injury induced a displacement of the centers of pressures (COP) of both compartments that was always partially reversed by repair and worsened by meniscectomy.

Conclusion

The avulsion of the ARLM produces significant alterations in the knee contact biomechanics, increasing pressures and reducing contact area on the lateral articular cartilage, being greater at low knee flexion angles where they resemble a total meniscectomy. Additionally, the lesion modifies COP positions in both articular compartments, indicating kinematical alterations. In-situ repair partially restores these biomechanical alterations to the preinjury condition.