2023 ISAKOS Biennial Congress Paper
     
	Return to Sports Bridge Program Improves Outcomes, Decreases Ipsilateral Knee Re-injury and Contralateral Knee Injury Rates Post-ACL Reconstruction:  2022 Update
	
		
				
					John  Nyland, EdD, DPT, Louisville, Kentucky UNITED STATES
				
			
				
					Jennifer  Brey, MD, Louisville, Kentucky UNITED STATES
				
			
				
					Samuel  Carter, MD, Louisville, KY UNITED STATES
				
			
				
					Ryan Jeffrey Krupp, MD, Prospect, KY UNITED STATES
				
			
				
					Brandon  Pyle, MS, ATC, Louisville, KY UNITED STATES
				
			
				
					David N. M. Caborn, MD, Crestwood, KY UNITED STATES
				
			
		
		Norton Orthopedic Institute, Spalding University, Louisville, Kentucky, UNITED STATES
		
		FDA Status Not Applicable
	
    
		Summary
        
            Supplementing primary ACL reconstruction and standard physical therapy with a return to sports bridge program prior to release to unrestricted sports performance was effective at improving patient outcomes and decreasing ipsilateral knee re-injury and contralateral knee injury rates
        
     
    
    
	    Abstract
		
        Purpose
To present the results of a return to sports bridge program designed to reduce knee injuries following ACL reconstruction and physical therapy.
Methods
Two hundred and twelve (male = 111, female = 101) patients participated in an 8-week duration whole body neuromuscular control, progressive resistance strength and agility training program.  Post-program testing included functional movement form, dynamic knee stability, lower extremity power, agility, and sports skill assessments.  Participants completed the Knee Outcome Survey–Sports Activity Scale (KOS-SAS) before and after program initiation.  Subjects re-estimated their pre-participation scores following program completion.
Results
Global KOS-SAS scores at program entry were 75.8 ± 14.  Post-program global rating and calculated KOS-SAS scores were 91.0 ± 9.8 and 90.9 ± 9.7, respectively (p < 0.0001).  Pre-participation KOS-SAS score re-estimates at program completion were 54.8 ± 23 (global) and 58.2 ± 20 (calculated).  The approximately 30% lower pre-program global KOS-SAS score re-estimate (46.7 ± 32 vs. 75.8 ± 14), and 20% calculated KOS-SAS score re-estimate (56.2 ± 27 vs. 75.0 ± 15)(p = 0.04) observed at program completion suggests that subjects had inaccurately high sports readiness perceptions at program entry.  Perceived overall sports activity knee function ratings improved from 2.9 ± 0.6 (abnormal) at program entry to 1.2 ± 0.5 (normal) at completion (p < 0.001).  Most subjects returned back to sports at or above their pre-injury performance skill/performance level (84%, 179/212).  By 7.7 ± 4.0 years (range = 2–15 years) post-surgery, 14 subjects had sustained an ipsilateral knee re-injury or contralateral knee injury (6.6%).  The 2.8% non-contact contralateral and 1.9% non-contact ipsilateral knee injury rates observed were significantly lower than those cited in previous reports.
Conclusion
Supplementing primary ACL reconstruction and standard physical therapy with a return to sports bridge program prior to release to unrestricted sports performance was effective at improving patient outcomes and decreasing ipsilateral knee re-injury and contralateral knee injury rates.