2015 ISAKOS Biennial Congress ePoster #1409
Third Generation of Rotating Hinged Knees in Poliomyelitic Patients With Knee Pain
Domenico Tigani, MD, Bologna ITALY
Saverio Comitini, MD, Catania ITALY
Matteo Commessatti, MD, Bologna ITALY
Giuseppe Melucci, Salerno, SA ITALY
Antonio Martucci, MD, Bologna ITALY
Maria Antonietta Liberati, MD, Bologna ITALY
Paolo Gentile, MD Orto e Trauma, Bologna ITALY
Ospedale Maggiore Bologna, Bologna, BO, ITALY
FDA Status Not Applicable
Summary: In our experience, third generation RHK supplied satisfactory clinical results in poliomyelitic patients supplying good implant stability without interfere with existing intrinsic stability of the lower limb.
Abstract:
Introduction
Acute poliomyelitis is a very rare disease in western countries, however the remnant of the pathology can be find among the adult patients. In poliomyelitis, sensation is normal and patients may suffer from painful etiologies. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with non-hinged or semi hinged prosthesis systems may be a good options to relief the pain in poliomyelitic patients, however the knee remains unstable. Using the hinged system implant may be the good option to resolve the late. Although the main concern in case of hinged implant usage is the mechanical stress which is directly transferred to the bone surface in contact with the implant. This may leads to implant mobilization and consequently failure.
Methods
and Materials
From 2004 to 2010, 14 TKA were performed in poliomyelitic patients with secondary knee pain. All patients were presented with extensor compartment hyposthenia and reduced antigravity function. In all patients a third generation rotating hinged knees (RHK) implant system (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) was applied. Bilateral TKA was performed in only one case. The mean age at the time of surgery was 56 years (ranged 48-77). Mean follow-up was 60 months (24-112).
Results
Due to post-operative infection, one patient underwent knee arthrodesis and excluded from the study. In one case, patellar fracture occurred 3 month following the surgery and treated non-surgically. Pain relief was observed in all patients following the surgery without any major complication. Mean objective score according to knee society knee scoring system was improved from 28 (16-51) preoperatively to 79 (72-88) postoperatively. Mean functional score was improved from 24 (5-35) preoperatively to 66 (50-70) postoperatively. At last follow up the mean range of motion was 90° (75°-100°). Following radiographic control at last follow-up all implants was stable without any sign of failure such as mobilization, radiolucency line or osteolysis.
Conclusion
Providing stable knee implant system is the most important factor in addition to pain relief in case of poliomyelitic patients with knee pain. In our experience, third generation RHK supplied satisfactory clinical results in poliomyelitic patients supplying good implant stability without interfere with existing intrinsic stability of the lower limb. We believe that good results were achieved due to particular specification of RHK implant including mild 3° of hyperextension and weight distribution mode in which 95% transfer to polyethylene insert and only 5% to hinged compartment that help to restore the stability in such a particular patients also in case of late post-polio syndrome.