Search Filters

  • Presentation Format
  • Media Type
  • Diagnosis / Condition
  • Diagnosis Method
  • Patient Populations
  • Treatment / Technique

Patient Satisfaction and Joint Stability following Simple Elbow Dislocations: Surgical versus Non-Surgical Treatment

2021 Congress Paper Abstracts

Patient Satisfaction and Joint Stability following Simple Elbow Dislocations: Surgical versus Non-Surgical Treatment

Stephanie Geyer, MD, GERMANY Lucca Lacheta, MD, GERMANY Jesse Seilern Und Aspang, MD, GERMANY Lukas Willinger, MD, GERMANY Patricia Maria Lutz, MD, GERMANY Andreas B. Imhoff, MD, Prof.emerit., GERMANY Sebastian Siebenlist, MD, MHBA, Prof., GERMANY

Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Bavaria, GERMANY


2021 Congress   Abstract Presentation   6 minutes   Not yet rated

 

Anatomic Location

Diagnosis / Condition

Treatment / Technique

Diagnosis Method

Sports Medicine

This media is available to ISAKOS 2021: Global Registrants and On Demand purchases only.
Please log in or purchase to access.


Summary: The objective of this study was to compare patient rated outcome measurements (PROMs) and joint stability via ultrasound in patients following conservative or surgical treatment after simple elbow dislocation.


Purpose

While conservative management is commonly promoted for simple elbow dislocations, the importance of primary surgical treatment in these injuries is still undetermined. The objective of this study was to compare patient rated outcome measurements (PROMs) and joint stability via ultrasound in patients following conservative or surgical treatment after simple elbow dislocation.

Methods

Patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months after conservative or surgical treatment following simple elbow dislocation were included. To evaluate patients’ individual postoperative outcome and satisfaction, the Elbow-Self-Assessment-Score (ESAS) was used, and validated scores such as the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and Quick Disability of Arm and Shoulder Score (Quick DASH) were assessed. For objective assessment of joint instability, a standardized clinical and dynamic ultrasound evaluation of the affected and contralateral elbow were performed.

Results

44 patients (26 women, 18 men) with an average age of 41.5 ± 15.3 years were clinically and sonographically assessed. The mean follow-up period was 65.5 ± 30.4 months (range 26 - 123). 21 patients were treated conservatively (CT group) in accordance with a standardized protocol and 23 patients (ST group) received surgical treatment. No statistical difference was found between the conservative group and the surgical group concerning ROM, the ESAS (CT group: 99.4 ± 1.5 points; ST group: 99.8 ± 0.3 points), MEPS (CT group: 97.3 ± 6.8 points; ST group: 98.7 ± 3.3 points) and Quick DASH (CT group: 7.8 ± 10.4 points; ST group: 6.3 ± 7.9 points) (p>0,05). Two patients (9.5%) reported severe subjective instability of the treated elbow (both CT group). No statistically significant difference was found in sonographic measurements comparing the two groups and the two groups to their respective unaffected side (p>0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with conservatively, as well as surgically treated simple elbow dislocations can achieve high patient satisfaction and good to excellent clinical results. Even though ultrasound evaluation showed no significant differences in joint gapping between groups, nearly 10% of the conservative treated patients complained about severe subjective instability. Thus, especially for high demanding patients, individual conditions should be considered and discussed regarding primary surgical approach.


More ISAKOS 2021: Global Content