2017 ISAKOS Biennial Congress ePoster #1081
Double-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Superior to Single-Bundle Reconstruction in Terms of Revision Frequency - a Study of 22,460 Patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register
Eleonor Svantesson, MD, Gothenburg SWEDEN
David S. Sundemo, MD, Stenungsund, Västra Götaland SWEDEN
Eric Hamrin Senorski, PT, PhD, MSc, Västra Frölunda SWEDEN
Eduard Alentorn-Geli, MD, PhD, MSc, FEBOT, FACGME, Barcelona SPAIN
Volker Musahl, MD, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania UNITED STATES
Freddie H. Fu, MD, Pittsburgh, PA UNITED STATES
Neel Desai, MD, PhD, Mölndal SWEDEN
Anders Stalman, MD, PhD, Saltsjöbaden SWEDEN
Kristian Samuelsson, Prof, MD, PhD, MSc, Mölndal, Västra Götalands län SWEDEN
Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, SWEDEN
FDA Status Not Applicable
Numbers from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register show that double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with a lower risk of revision surgery than single-bundle reconstruction.
Studies comparing single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions often include a combined analysis of anatomic and non-anatomic techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the revision rates between single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions in the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register with regard to surgical variables as determined by the anatomic ACL reconstruction scoring checklist (AARSC).
Patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register who underwent either single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft during the period 2007-2014 were included. The follow-up period started with primary ACL reconstruction and the outcome measure was set as revision surgery. An online questionnaire based on the items of the AARSC was used to determine the surgical technique implemented in the single-bundle procedures. These were organized into subgroups based on surgical variables, and the revision rates were compared with the double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and adjusted for confounders by Cox regression.
A total of 22,460 patients were included in the study, of which 21,846 were single-bundle and 614 were double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction had a revision frequency of 2.0% (n=12) and single-bundle 3.2% (n=689). Single-bundle reconstruction had an increased risk of revision surgery compared with double-bundle (Adjusted HR=1.98 [95 % CI, 1.12-3.51] p=0.019). The subgroup analysis showed a significantly increased risk of revision surgery in patients undergoing single-bundle with anatomic technique using transportal drilling (Adjusted HR=2.51 [95 % CI, 1.39-4.54] p=0.002) compared with double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Utilizing a more complete anatomic technique according to the AARSC lowered the hazard rate considerably when transportal drilling was performed but still resulted in significantly increased risk of revision surgery compared with double-bundle ACL reconstruction (Adjusted HR=1.87 [95 % CI 1.04-3.38] p=0.037).
Double-bundle ACL reconstruction is associated with a lower risk of revision surgery than single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Single-bundle procedures performed using transportal femoral drilling technique had significantly higher risk of revision surgery compared with double-bundle. However, a reference reconstruction with transportal drilling defined as a more complete anatomic reconstruction reduces the risk of revision surgery considerably.