2015 ISAKOS Biennial Congress Paper #0
Clinical Outcomes of Combined ACL & Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 2018 Patients
Adnan Saithna, MD, FRCS, Scottsdale, AZ UNITED STATES
Charles Pioger, MD, Lyon FRANCE
Lampros Gousopoulos, MD, FRCS, Lyon FRANCE
Graeme P. Hopper, MBChB, MSc, MRCSEd, MFSTEd, MD, FRCSGlas (Tr&Orth), Glasgow UNITED KINGDOM
João Pedro Campos PORTUGAL
Corentin Philippe, MD, Lyon FRANCE
Thais Dutra Vieira, MD, Lyon, Rhone FRANCE
Abdo Helou, MD, Lyon FRANCE
Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet, MD, PhD, Lyon, Rhône FRANCE
Santy Clinic, Lyon, Rhone-Alps, FRANCE
FDA Status Cleared
Summary: Risk of ACL graft rupture is 3-fold greater with isolated "gold standard" BTB grafts when compared to ACL+ALLR with hamstring autografts
Abstract:
Background
The aims of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes following “gold standard” ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with a bone patellar-tendon bone (BPTB) autograft versus ACLR combined with an anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) using hamstring tendon autografts (HT), in a large series of propensity matched patients. The hypothesis was that combined reconstructions would confer better graft rupture rates and lower non-graft rupture related re-operation rates than isolated ACLR with BPTB
Methods
A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. Patients undergoing combined ACLR+ALLR using HT between 2003 and 2019 were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients undergoing isolated ACLR using BPTB. At the end of the study period rates of graft rupture, contralateral knee injury and any other re-operations or complications that occurred were identified by database interrogation, review of medical records and standardized telephone interview. It was anticipated that there would be significant differences in the duration of follow-up between the groups due to a larger proportion of patients undergoing combined reconstructions toward the latter part of the study period. For that reason, statistical techniques that are unaffected by any differences in durations of follow up between groups were used to evaluate graft survivorship, re-operation free survivorship and the significance of potentially important risk factors. Specifically, Kaplan Meier survivorship analyses and Cox-proportional hazards models were used because both evaluate time to event data and are independent of the overall duration of follow up.
Results
A total of 2018 patients (1009 matched pairs) were included. The mean duration of followup was 101.3. Kaplan Meier Analysis demonstrated a significantly better graft survivorship in the ACLR+ALLR group when compared to the BPTB group at every time point assessed. The Cox model demonstrated that patients in the BPTB group were > 3-fold more likely to experience graft failure than those in the ACLR+ALLR group (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 3.554 [1.744;7.243], p = 0.0005). Patients aged less than 20 years were at particularly high risk of graft rupture (HR = 5.65 [1.834;17.241], p = 0.0002) and further analysis of this subgroup demonstrated that isolated ACLR with BPTB also conferred a > 3 fold increased risk of graft rupture in young patients when compared to ACLR+ALLR. Multivariate analysis did not identify any other significant risk factors for graft rupture. Overall, there was a significantly higher reoperation rate following isolated ACLR (BPTB group 20.5%, ACLR+ALLR group 8.9%, p < 0.0001). This finding was accounted for by significantly higher rates of graft rupture (9.9% vs 3.5%, p <0.0001), cyclops syndrome (3.3% vs 1.5%, p <0.0001), and secondary meniscectomy (5% vs 2.9%) in the BPTB group.
Discussion And Conclusion
Patients who underwent isolated ACLR with BPTB autografts experienced significantly worse ACL graft survivorship and overall re-operation free survivorship when compared to those who underwent combined ACLR+ALLR with hamstring autografts. The risk of graft rupture was more than 3-fold higher in patients who underwent isolated ACLR using BPTB.