2021 ISAKOS Biennial Congress ePoster
A comparison of the transtibial pullout technique and all-inside meniscal repair in medial meniscus posterior root tear: Prognostic factors and midterm clinical outcomes
Lika Dzidzishvili, MD, Barcelona SPAIN
Irene Isabel López-Torres, MD, PhD, Madrid SPAIN
Jm Arguello, MD, PhD, Madrid SPAIN
David Sáez, MD, Madrid SPAIN
Amaya Barberia, MD, Madrid SPAIN
Emilio Calvo, MD, PhD, MBA, Madrid SPAIN
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, SPAIN
FDA Status Cleared
Summary
All-inside meniscal suture of medial meniscal posterior root tears showed a comparable clinical and radiological outcome with transtibial pullout technique in middle-age patients
ePosters will be available shortly before Congress
Abstract
Background
There is a paucity of comparative clinical data between arthroscopic all-inside end-to-end meniscal root suture and transtibial pullout technique in medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT).
Objectives
This study aimed to compare treatment failure, mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of all-inside meniscus root repair versus the transtibial pullout technique and to analyze prognostic factors of postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes.
Study Design & Methods
Forty-four patients were included in two therapeutic group: arthroscopic all-inside meniscal suture (MS: 13 knees) and transtibial pullout technique (TP: 31 knees).
Primary clinical outcomes at a minimum of 27.2 months postoperatively included Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Lysholm Knee Questionnare (LKQ). Radiographic assessment of the knee was performed to determine osteoarthritis severity using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system.
In addition, pre and postoperative MRI scans and intraoperative arthroscopic findings were recorded and the correlations between these findings, as outcome predictors and postoperative patients reported subjective outcome were assessed.
Results
No significant differences in postoperative KOOS and LKQ scores were found between the MS and TP group (p=0.38 and 0.17, respectively.
During follow-up one patients (7.7%) in the MS group and two (6.5%) in the TP group underwent total knee arthroplasty. The difference did not reach the statistical significance (p=0.88).
No differences were observed in postoperative MRI findings such as meniscal extrusion, osteochondral defect, chondromalacia patella, and bone morrow edema (p=0.25, 0.97, 0.97, and 0.88, respectively).
A univariate model revealed that the presence of postoperative meniscal extrusion; osteochondral defect; chondromalacia patella; increased BMI; age (>40 years) and longer time lapse between clinical onset to surgery (>6 months) were predictors of poor clinical outcome. The presence of meniscal extrusion, osteochondral defect and chondropatia patella portended worst postoperative outcomes in a multiple linear regression model.
Conclusions
It can be concluded that both techniques can reach good results when performed properly and if the injury pattern allows meniscal suture may be considered a treatment option for the management of MMPRT in well-selected patients.
Patients with increased BMI, preoperative meniscal extrusion, chondromalacia patella, and osteochondral defect were at higher risk of poor clinical outcomes.