2023 ISAKOS Biennial Congress ePoster
Ankle Distraction Arthroplasty: A Survivorship Review and Meta-Analysis
Anthony Santo Machi, MD, Philadelphia, PA UNITED STATES
S. Ali Ghasemi, MD, Bryn Mawr, PA UNITED STATES
Joshua Rory Buksbaum, BS, Brooklyn, New York UNITED STATES
S Rozbruch, New York, NY UNITED STATES
Austin T. Fragomen, MD, New York, NY UNITED STATES
Albert Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, UNITED STATES
FDA Status Not Applicable
Summary
Ankle Distraction Arthroplasty is a viable joint-preserving treatment option with promising short to intermediate term outcomes.
ePosters will be available shortly before Congress
Abstract
Multiple treatments exist for ankle osteoarthritis. Ankle arthrodesis is the gold standard in late-stage osteoarthritis, but sacrifices range of motion and risks nonunion. Total ankle arthroplasty is typically reserved for low-demand patients as the long-term outcomes are poor. Ankle distraction arthroplasty is a joint sparing procedure which utilizes external fixator frame to unload the joint. This promotes chondral repair and improves function. This study aimed to organize clinical data and survivorship in published papers and direct further research efforts.
31 publications were evaluated and sixteen were included in the meta-analysis. The Modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess quality of the individual publications. Random effects models were used to estimate the failure risk after ankle distraction arthroplasty. AOS, AOFAS, Van Valburg, and Visual Analog Scores all improved postoperatively.
Random effects model analysis revealed an overall failure ratio of 11% (95% CI: 7%-15%; P.value=0.001; I2 =87.01%) after 46.68±7.17 months follow up, 9% (95% CI: 5%-12%; P.value=0.001 I2=81.59%) with less than 5 years follow up and 28% (95% CI: 16%-41%; P.value=0.001 I2=69.03%) for patients with more than 5 years follow up.
Ankle Distraction Arthroplasty has promising short to intermediate term outcomes which makes this a reasonable treatment option to delay joint sacrificing surgery. The selection of the optimal candidates and consistent technique would improve research and subsequently outcomes. Based on our meta-analysis, negative prognostic factors include female sex, obesity, ROM<20 degrees, leg muscle weakness, high activity level, low preoperative pain levels, higher preoperative clinical scores, inflammatory arthritis, septic arthritis, and deformity.